MAPPING VICTORIA - UVic

University of Victoria - Sinclair Rd

Building Info

510-bed residence buildings with a 17 storey high-rise wing
60 beds (90 quad units) for upper-year undergraduates, and a 7 storey wing with 150 studio apartments for graduate students
Project cost is estimated at $178 million, construction expected to begin Spring 2026 and complete in 2029
Design yet to be finalized but likely will remain close to the renderings provided

Developer

University of Victoria
University of Victoria Project Website

Architect

Diamond Schmitt Architects

Context

Location - parking lot off Sinclair Road, replacing about 120 existing parking spaces

Status

January 2026 Status - active proposal stage
"UVic has held two phases of community consultations to date, sharing information and receiving input from neighbours and other interest-holders that will help shape the project. A final phase of engagement is anticipated in early Spring 2026 to share the design and provide updated information on the construction process."

Media and Images

October 3, 2025 UVic announcement
October 4, 2025 Times Colonist news story

Image © UVic

Location

Google Street View

July 2025
August 2017

Planning Process Deep Dive

On December 3, 2025 Saanich held a virtual Advisory Design Panel meeting with representatives from UVic and Diamond Schmitt Architects including Anna Maria Llanos, lead for their Vancouver office. The full minutes can be viewed here.

As this is an institutionally zoned project it does not require a Development Permit; however, "due to the scale of the project, staff deemed it appropriate to seek ADP feedback (with the applicant’s support)." The ADP motion which was unanimously supported stated:

“That it be recommended that the design to construct a new student housing project in a proposed 17-storey high-rise with a seven-storey podium at 3800 Finnerty Road be approved subject to considerations of:

Increased natural light into the residential spaces;
Additional amenity space within the tower;
Softening or increased visual interest of the project.”

While supportive in general, the ADP noted the following:

The external expression was described as institutional rather than residential.
The architecture was characterized as austere, institutional, or lacking warmth and residential character.
Key concerns included the low window-to-wall ratio and limited natural light, repetitive cladding with minimal volumetric articulation, and a reliance on surface treatments rather than massing shifts to create visual interest.
Terracotta and brick materials were positively received as warm, high-quality, campus appropriate elements.
Given the tower’s future visibility as the tallest structure on campus, members encouraged additional attention to its visual prominence.

Page updated

Google Sites

Report abuse